Global Investment and Macro Themes
Alex Gunz, Fund Manager at Heptagon Capital, John Porter, Chief Investment Officer of Newton Investment Management, and Zehrid Osmani, and Senior Portfolio Manager at Martin Currie - a specialist investment manager of Franklin Templeton join Jill Malandrino on Nasdaq TradeTalks to discuss global investment and macro themes and what areas of the market are most attractive for investors.
00:06Welcome to NASDAQ Trade talks,
00:08where we meet with the Top T thought Leaders and strategist in emerging technologies,
00:11digital assets, a regulatory landscape and global capital markets.
00:14I'm her host Ji Melnrno,
00:15and join me this afternoon.
00:17We have Alex Guns fund manager at Hepagon Capital.
00:19John Porter, Chief Investment Officer of Newton Investment Management, and Zara Das Mani,
00:24senior portfolio manager at Martin Curry,
00:26a specialist Investment Manager of Franklin Templeton.
00:29They joined me to discuss global investment themes,
00:31what we should be finding attractive,
00:33what to avoid an outlook as we go into the second half of the year.
00:37It is great to have everyone with us.
00:38And let's kick it off and get everyone's macro thoughts here, Alex.
00:42Starting with you from a global macro perspective,
00:45and particularly the impact of what's happening with
00:47the Fed in the US and global central banks around the world.
00:51Well, thanks for having me on the show deal.
00:53It's always a pleasure to be here.
00:55And we think this is generally a very good environment for equities.
00:59Basically, global growth is looking fairly decent.
01:03The path for inflation is heading slowly, but surely downwards,
01:07and central banks are in a position again,
01:10slowly, but surely towards easing.
01:12So this is an environment that should be very conducive to equities,
01:15particularly as earnings momentum is actually picking up at present.
01:20I'd also note that with so much money sitting on the sidelines in cash,
01:23$6,000,000,000,000 at the moment,
01:25there's a huge opportunity to see that money deployed.
01:28Yeah. And John, what I think is interesting and we've been covering this,
01:32on the show quite frequently is that it's very bifurcated.
01:35It feels as if there's two different economies,
01:37two different markets. What are your thoughts around that?
01:39Yeah, I agree very much, hill.
01:42You know, some people have described this as a K shaped economy,
01:45and I think that's an app description.
01:47I think there are certain portions of the economy, larger companies,
01:51more affluent consumers that are thriving right now,
01:54and the higher interest rate environment is not an issue for them whatsoever.
01:58However, I also see other areas of the economy, smaller businesses,
02:02the lower income cohorts of the economy that are really starting
02:05to struggle with the sustained high rates,
02:08and that's becoming an increasing challenge for them.
02:10I think as the Fed looks at the landscape,
02:13they're trying to thread that needle not
02:15over inflating the economy for those who are doing well,
02:18but being mindful, the risks they are
02:20posed for some other elements of the economy right now,
02:23that they're quite concerned about.
02:24Interesting, John, because when we were talking about coming out of
02:27the pendic that it was a K shaped recovery.
02:30And now we're here talking about,
02:31you know a shaped in terms of bifurcated economies.
02:35But Z, let's talk about this for a moment here.
02:37It feels as if inflation is going to be stickier for longer.
02:40So how do you think that impacts the Fed's policy?
02:43Yeah. So our view is that when you're looking at inflation,
02:47you need to look at wage inflation because that's by far
02:50the biggest contributor in the medium term to inflationary pressures,
02:53and wage inflation, whether you look at the US,
02:56at Europe, the UK, remains elevated,
02:59and therefore, there's a potential risk of second in effect on inflationary pressures.
03:05So we've heard from the Fed,
03:06they're being more cautious in terms of the prospects of cutting rates.
03:12We're entering into this cycle.
03:13Our view was always that Central Banks would start
03:16cutting in H two of this year rather than H one,
03:19and more or less that's what's happening even if the ECB has gone one month early.
03:25But we're really getting into this cycle
03:28with monetary policies where central banks are data dependent.
03:32Therefore, any inflation prints will bring volatility,
03:35both in bond markets and in equity markets,
03:39as investors speculate about what could be the next moves.
03:43It's also an interesting phase for central banks in that they're signaling hawkish cuts,
03:50which really sums it up,
03:52which is that they're willing to
03:55cut But reluctantly having to admit that inflation is not where they want it to be.
04:01So it almost feels like central banks have maybe signaled cuts too soon,
04:08and therefore need to maybe make a first cut just to please the market,
04:14but then trying to adjust the narrative
04:16to really highlight that their focus remains on inflation.
04:19And as we know, inflation remains an important battle for central banks.
04:25It's always easier to
04:27reignite growth and to extinguish inflation if there's a second rank.
04:32So it's probably the right approach to.
04:35What it means for corporate earnings,
04:38clearly, there will be an element of potential pressure on margins.
04:41Even if we haven't seen that extensively at this stage,
04:45but we would be watching out for any company that struggles in terms of pricing power,
04:50and therefore could have more pressure on margins.
04:53And then we've already started to see more profit warnings in the consumer space.
04:58So the comments earlier about a two speed economy with some parts of the consumers that
05:04are getting hit harder by the higher cost of living crisis is absolutely valid.
05:11Yeah. Well, Alex, let's Gear for a moment here and talk about another area of risk.
05:15Geopolitical risk that we're seeing happening in Europe,
05:18there was a French snap election, and Sara,
05:20I'd like to get your thoughts on this as well after Alex chimes in.
05:23But do you think there's going to be a broader policy shift in the EU as a result of,
05:30how this is starting to shift?
05:32I think what we've seen consistently,
05:35de al is that it's very dangerous to try and infer causality from political events.
05:40And we saw this clearly back in 2016,
05:43with Brexit, with Trump 1.0.
05:46And I think there is,
05:48without a doubt, heightened uncertainty.
05:51But in terms of how we translate that into investment policy,
05:55It's really about sticking to the basics, keeping things simple,
06:00thinking about diversification, in broad multi asset portfolios,
06:04using gold potentially as a hedge.
06:06And whilst I think that the French news is certainly near term uncomfortable,
06:11we need to look at it in the bigger picture.
06:14Mm hmm.
06:16Point of view. Yeah. We would
06:19echo the fact that geopolitical risk in Europe has increased.
06:23And if you look in previous episodes of political flare ups,
06:28the markets tend to overreact compared to the implication.
06:33In this instance, when we were looking at the European elections,
06:37we took the view that
06:39the radical right would increase its number of seats in the European Parliament,
06:45but that the majority would stay with the moderates,
06:48and therefore, European policies would remain unchanged.
06:52In the case of France,
06:53what we were highlighting is that the real risk is
06:562027 rather than 2024 with the French presidential elections.
07:02The development in France has been surprising
07:06by the French president calling for a snap election,
07:10and there could be an increased focus there.
07:14Clearly, the yields on French treasuries are widening.
07:19But what we would highlight is a worst case scenario from this SNAP election is that
07:25the radical right party of Le Pain does get to be in a prime ministerial seat.
07:35There would be what we call in France a cohabitation between
07:39a president that's moderate and prime minister that's more radical right.
07:45It would probably create a lack of ability to make policy decisions, ultimately.
07:53The market could potentially see it as a risk to the European integration agenda,
08:01but we would go back to it's not so much 24,
08:04it's 2027, that will be important.
08:07So if the SNAP elections are a reflection of what could come in 27 with
08:13a potential increased risk of a radical right accessing to the presidency,
08:19then the dynamics could be different,
08:21and then the market would worry more.
08:24Yeah. And then John shifting gears to the US,
08:26I mean, we've seen over, you know,
08:28the past 100 years or so that the markets time to digest a change in regime,
08:34or if it in fact is the same regime,
08:35but I feel like what's happening in the US is
08:37more factoring the discretionary spending that we're seeing,
08:42the government engaging in.
08:45Oh, absolutely. I think when you look at what's going on in the US economy right now,
08:50and I think Alex alluded to this in some of his opening comments,
08:54that the US economy is in a pretty good place right now,
08:58the nowcasting forecast look like we're going to have
09:01a 3% plus or minus GDP for the second quarter.
09:05And historically in election years,
09:07you see, you know,
09:09when this bipartisan comment,
09:11you see a lot of spending and you see a lot of support for the broad economy.
09:14And there certainly seems to be the potential
09:16for significant spending this year to bolster the economy.
09:19So it seems to me, like the risk in the US economy in the short term is over inflating,
09:26exacerbating the inflation problem rather than any threats of a recession,
09:31which is what we've been, you know,
09:32wringing our hands about for a couple of years now,
09:35but it continues to be you know,
09:37out in the future to worry about.
09:39Yeah. Well, let's shift gears and talk a moment, John,
09:43about how you're thinking about portfolio allocation,
09:45whether it's in terms of sectors or asset classes.
09:48Do you look at more holistically,
09:49or is it more down to a fundamental level where there's
09:52some good names and also bad names within certain sectors?
09:57Yeah, at the end of the day, Joe,
09:58I'm a traditional stock picker.
10:00So absolutely align with your later comments.
10:05I think there are great stocks in
10:07every sector and some bad ones in just about every sector.
10:09There's some places that look more favorable.
10:12One of the areas that I see a lot of potential in is the health care area up and down.
10:17I think that there's been a lot
10:20of COVID revealed a lot of problems with the healthcare sector,
10:24and I think there's going to be an awful lot of
10:26innovation in healthcare over the next five to ten years,
10:28they are incredibly exciting.
10:30You look at artificial intelligence,
10:32which is such a powerful theme,
10:33healthcare is going to be one of the biggest beneficiaries of that.
10:36So that's one area that looks very attractive to me.
10:39Energy looks very appealing right now as well.
10:42The supply constraints on the part of the producers is very impressive.
10:47They're being very disciplined in terms of how they deploy their capital,
10:51and I think that's improving the returns for the sector,
10:53and I think that is going to be a good place to
10:56invest from a longer term time horizon, as well.
10:58Right. And Alex, I'd like to get your perspective as well because you tend to have
11:01a longer term thesis looking at different sectors that will help the global economy,
11:06whether through digitization or technology to evolve.
11:10So what looks attractive to you right now?
11:12Well, I think the points that John made were exceptionally valid,
11:16and our R stance has always been very much multi thematic,
11:21combining those top down
11:22secular trends with very much the bottom up stock picking approach.
11:26And just to sort of zoom in on the health care sector, you know,
11:29one area I'd like to call out is, you know,
11:31there's been huge interest in GOP one,
11:34glucogen like peptide drugs.
11:36And actually, we are still,
11:38in our mind, very much scratching the surface.
11:40You think about it like this, 540 million people globally today have diabetes.
11:45Only about 15% of them are in good control of their illness.
11:49800 million people globally are suffering from obesity.
11:53Only about 2% of them are treated.
11:55And then we're just at the very early stage of
11:58treating potentially Alzheimer's using these drugs as well.
12:01And that could again be another multi million opportunity.
12:04So that's the story in healthcare.
12:06With an energy just to cover that off,
12:08we think that the alternative energy story still has a long way to run.
12:13And really, when you frame it in the context of
12:15just how much energy is being used really to power,
12:19anything to do with artificial intelligence.
12:21A AI server, just to give you some context,
12:24probably requires about ten to 30 times more energy than a cloud server.
12:28So we think the whole energy ecosystem,
12:31particularly the suppliers of
12:33grid infrastructure and those who are able to upgrade infrastructure,
12:37there's some really exciting opportunities there.
12:40And that's just two sectors.
12:41Yeah. And there you're aligned with this because I know
12:44your three key areas are energy transition and aging population,
12:47and of course, AI as well.
12:48Yeah, that's right. And what's exciting for long term investors is,
12:53The effectively almost industrial revolution,
12:57as Jensen and Wang has put it,
12:59is coming through as a result of AI,
13:02we would call it techno industrial revolution.
13:05So there are business models used to grow at
13:08five to 6% annualized in the industrial space that will
13:12be accelerating over the next ten years as a result of
13:16the various themes are being boosted by AI,
13:20whether it's robotics and automation,
13:22whether it's cloud infrastructure and all the construction and the building around that,
13:29whether it's cybersecurity or metaverse or quantum computing.
13:35We think there's a very interesting opportunity for
13:40investors to capture some of this investment cycle going on in AI,
13:45going on in energy transition,
13:47going on in healthcare infrastructure as a result of that aging population.
13:52At the same time, what we see is
13:55a potential risk of frost starting to come through in AI.
13:58So we look at a basket of over 50 stocks.
14:02Their share price has gone up by about 44% over the last 12 months,
14:07yet their earnings have only been upgraded by 7%.
14:11So it's important to focus on companies that can monetize.
14:15There are companies, as we know,
14:16that have been at the center of that AI investment spend,
14:21companies like I Vedia and those companies have really shown that
14:25their earnings momentum highlights that they can capture that spend quite forcefully.
14:31So for investors, it will be important to start
14:34differentiating between those companies that will need to spend on AI,
14:37and that might not necessarily monetize.
14:40And those are the recipients of that outside spend,
14:43and therefore they can more readily monetize.
14:46Yeah. Agile, if you don't mind me asking a question,
14:49that I'd love your point
14:51about AI and sort of balancing the short term with the long term.
14:54One of my favorite sayings is people always underestimate the change in
14:58ten years and overestimate in two years. How do you gauge?
15:02Where do you think we are in the AI hype cycle?
15:04Because we're somewhere in that curve,
15:07but, you know, clearly we haven't peaked yet.
15:10And, you know, the peak so could be another 50% move away,
15:13and it's gauging that sort of short term, you know,
15:17irrational exuberance to use a term from the past and balancing with,
15:21you know, the current market is is a challenge. What do you think?
15:26Yeah, you're absolutely right. Well, we think we're still early, and therefore,
15:29there's still more upside potential over the next couple of years or so,
15:34at least, because of the size of the upgrade cycle that's needed.
15:39Notably the hyperscalers, they're in a bit of
15:42an arms race as to who upgrades the cloud infrastructure the fastest.
15:47So the incremental CAPX on what was already high numbers for
15:52the hyperscalers and Meta equates to about $130,000,000,000 over the next three years.
15:59This is incremental compared to what they were looking to spend 12 months ago.
16:05So that to us will drive that momentum nearer term.
16:11But your question is absolutely valid.
16:13When VDA was assessing the addressable market in March 21,
16:18They put that number at $300,000,000,000.
16:2212 months later, they increased that figure to $1,000,000,000,000.
16:26And in March of this year,
16:29they started bringing sovereign AI as another opportunity,
16:33which we totally believe in,
16:35and that's really nascent.
16:36But that got them to increase their addressable market to $2,000,000,000,000.
16:41So even a company that's at the heart of that AI theme is struggling to
16:47assess the addressable market or to upgrade it rapidly enough to keep up with events.
16:53Could I perhaps give an extra nuance to this debate, if I may.
16:58I mean, I think it's really important to distinguish between the infrastructure layer,
17:03which is really where all of the demand and the excitement is happening at the moment.
17:07We think and the application layer,
17:09and it's well and good buying these GPU servers at the moment.
17:14But I think nearly every business with with whom we engage really struggle
17:18to actually highlight what the tangible end market solutions are going to be.
17:23And I suppose the second framing comment might be the following You know,
17:27Cisco's thesis back in 99 2000 was absolutely spot on.
17:31The whole world became totally connected with routers,
17:35and yet Cisco never ever achieved or attained that valuation it had in 99 2000 again.
17:41And I think our worry is that NVDA may be absolutely right in its world view,
17:47but whether that is fully reflected in the price is perhaps more open to debate.
17:51And really, in terms of trying to move the story on to try and think more laterally,
17:56our approach is really to try and think about
17:58second derivatives or indirect beneficiaries of the theme.
18:02Yeah, so for us, we'd be a bit more high conviction in so much that
18:08when you're seeking second derivatives or beneficiaries that are adjacent,
18:14you are increasing the risk of being in areas that are
18:19more competitive where barriers to entry are actually collapsing quite rapidly,
18:24notably in the application and software space.
18:26What we've asked our analysts to do is really kick the tires
18:30very hard around what AI could mean,
18:33both as an opportunity for innovation,
18:36but also as a disruption.
18:38And what we're going to be realizing as investors over the next five years
18:41is that some barriers are collapsing very rapidly.
18:46There's already businesses that are being
18:48challenged by AI because they haven't been able to keep up.
18:51There's debate as to whether some of the big tech companies
18:55are late in terms of capturing the AI opportunity.
18:59There's discussions that we wouldn't have had
19:0118 months ago about is Google going to stay the Go to search engine.
19:05Or is open AI going to be able to have
19:08a much more powerful search engine that's AI power,
19:11and therefore, will lead to that massive migration by users.
19:17Questions we would I asked before.
19:20So when we identify companies that have a quasi monopolistic position,
19:24like NVDA does, that also have scale benefit,
19:29which means the R&D superiority will remain extremely
19:34significant that are able to therefore drive innovation even faster than previously,
19:39we believe that the best strategy is to
19:42actually stay with those companies because you can see
19:45that there the barriers are very high and are less likely to be disrupted. Yeah.
19:52Appreciate 30 seconds we got to wrap the head on.
19:55I find myself agreeing with both of them.
19:57I think that there's some direct plays on AI
20:00in video being a great example that you just can't avoid right now.
20:03I think it's way too early to worry about the peak there,
20:05but there are some electrical component makers, for example,
20:08that are big beneficiaries of the CAPX wave that's coming.
20:11So I think there's lots of great ways to play AI led by active management.
20:15All right, guys. A appreciate the insight.
20:16Thanks for joining us on Trae Talks.
20:18I'm Jie Malno Global Market to Porter at NDA.