Nasdaq Sustainability Solutions

    NGS_Industry_HigherEducation_AdobeStock_493808631.jpeg

    Understanding TCFD Reporting

    What is a TCFD Report?

     

    The Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) pursues the mission of helping companies improve their reporting of financial risks associated with climate change. Created in 2015 by the Financial Stability Board (FSB), the organization developed its TCFD recommendations as a set of principles to guide companies in providing forward-looking information relevant to financial decision-making. While much of the information may be included in other types of financial filings, companies that use TCFD recommendations typically issue a specific TCFD report with extensive data and details. 

    More than 4,000 organizations in over 100 countries have registered as supporters of the TCFD framework. According to the TCFD’s most recent status report, 92 of the 100 largest public companies in the world support the TCFD or issue reports in line with TCFD recommendations, and many companies do both. Although TCFD reporting began as a voluntary set of guidelines and standards, several countries or regions—with the European Union and the United Kingdom being the most prominent examples—have incorporated TCFD standards into mandatory regulations for climate-related disclosures.  

    Both trends—growing voluntary reporting and increasing regulatory requirements—are expected to accelerate. Increasingly, companies that are not already creating TCFD reports may find that they need a better understanding of TCFD recommendations and how they apply to business operations in order to meet the expectations of key stakeholders. 

    Four Core Elements of TCFD Reporting

     

    The TFCD framework is designed to provide information to a variety of financial entities, including investors, debt issuers, insurers, and more. The ultimate goal is to help financial markets operate better. With more accurate and timely disclosures about climate-related business factors, financial decision-makers can price risks, value assets, and allocate capital more efficiently.  

    To help achieve this vision, TCFD recommendations define a voluntary framework for reporting about business practices in four thematic areas

    1. Governance

    TCFD recommendations call for transparency about a company’s structure and approach for governance of climate-related risks and opportunities. Specific disclosures are recommended for board and management oversight responsibilities.

    2. Strategy

    Companies should provide information about material impacts (both potential and actual) of climate-related factors on businesses, strategy, and financial planning.

    3. Risk Management

    Complete reporting includes disclosures about how companies identify, assess, and manage risks related to climate. In addition to information about the particular risks involved, companies should also disclose how those risks are integrated into overall risk management.

    4. Metrics and Targets

    In effect, this thematic element means disclosing technical information about metrics used for identifying, assessing, and managing risks and opportunities as reported in the other three areas. This category includes metrics for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with specific disclosures for Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 emissions. 

    TCFD Reporting Principles

     

    To comply with TCFD recommendations, disclosures about the four core elements above should meet general criteria for information quality. The reporting framework defines seven principles to guide the decision-making process. Accordingly, disclosures should be:

    • Relevant 
    • Specific and complete 
    • Clear, balanced, and understandable 
    • Consistent over time 
    • Comparable among companies within a sector, industry, or portfolio 
    • Reliable, verifiable, and objective 
    • Provided on a timely basis 

    An emphasis on risk analysis distinguishes the TCFD recommendations relative to other reporting frameworks. TCFD guidelines divide risk assessment into two categories:  

    1. Transition risks

    Include any risks related to the transition to a lower-carbon economy. 

    2. Physical risks

    Encompass the physical impacts of climate change, whether from acute events or longer-term changes such as shifting weather patterns.

     

    Organizations may include scenario analysis into their risk management. TCFD reporting helps narrow the focus to concentrate on identifying potential business implications of climate-related risks and opportunities. Some companies report that this aspect of the TCFD reporting process is the most challenging to implement but that it also can generate some of the most valuable insights.  

    Partnering with a third-party, like Nasdaq ESG Solutions, can streamline scenario analysis and maximize outcomes. The Nasdaq ESG Advisory team can help organizations with scenario analysis exercises and Nasdaq Metrio, end-to-end sustainability reporting platform, can help with TCFD reporting.  

    Lessons from Real-World Examples

     

    Because TCFD recommendations are meant to be adaptable for different circumstances, even companies in the same industry may have very different processes and experiences. But even with a wide variety of approaches and processes, some key takeaways have emerged from companies that have been working with TCFD recommendations for multiple years. Companies that are new to TCFD reporting may learn some helpful lessons from such real-world examples. 

    Get Leadership Buy-In

    Multinational retailer Tesco found that establishing the chief financial officer (CFO) as a “champion” of the TCFD reporting process improved alignment across the company. “Having him supporting the project allowed us to get buy in throughout the company and gave the project team credibility,” the company reported.  

    Leverage Collaboration

    An effective approach to scenario analysis “requires bringing together people from parts of the organisation that normally may not have many reasons to collaborate,” according to energy company Ørsted. In Ørsted’s experience, bringing together contributors from six different teams, including sustainability, risk, ESG accounting, strategy, investor relations, and annual reporting teams, enabled the company to develop “a nuanced picture of the gaps in assessing potential climate-related risks and how to close them systematically.”  

    For Rolls-Royce plc, collaboration extended to working with outside expertise. The company started using scenario analysis in 2016 but was not satisfied with the results. To get more support, the power and propulsion systems provider engaged a strategy consultant to improve the process for analyzing future implications of climate change. As another example of external collaboration, Nasdaq ESG Advisory provides expert guidance to help companies at any stage assess opportunities and risks, define priorities, and plan effective strategies. 

    Learn by Doing

    TCFD recommendations do not require reporting companies to achieve perfect and comprehensive disclosures for an initial report. Rather, the guidelines allow for a learning process as companies acquire better data and improve their understanding of issues most relevant to their businesses. For example, Unilever found the lack of a universal best practice for scenario analysis challenging at first because the uncertainty increased complexity. Decision-makers chose to narrow the focus to a limited number of factors for which they had robust data. Defining this core of higher-confidence information allowed them to expand their analysis to include other factors as necessary in line with TCFD guidelines.     

    Engage Internal Stakeholders

    For commercial property development and investment company Landsec, engaging internal stakeholders before, during, and after the process proved beneficial in several ways. At the outset, management explained the project to internal stakeholders, the requirements involved, and the benefits that could be gained. To maximize reporting impact, investors relations and corporate communications teams were engaged to make sure that relevant information would be integrated into the company’s annual report. But engagement did not end with reporting. The findings were presented at team meetings throughout the company, and feedback was solicited on how information could be used. “Now the whole business has a better understanding of how climate change will affect their teams and how their strategies can be developed to minimise the risks and maximise the opportunities,” the company later reported

    Harnessing Transparency for Climate Resilience

     

    If climate-related sustainability goals are to be achieved on a global scale, financial markets will have to play a key role because they provide effective mechanisms for allocating capital to change business practices and drive the transition to sustainable economies. The TCFD reporting framework has become an increasingly influential factor in this transformation by providing a set of standards for increasing transparency and improving disclosures relevant to financial decision-makers. Moreover, government regulators in a growing number of jurisdictions are aligning their disclosure requirements with TCFD recommendations.  

    The potential benefits do not stop with improving outcomes for the global climate and environmental impacts. Individual companies can use the TCFD reporting process as a tool capable of driving business value in multiple ways. In addition to identifying opportunities to boost resiliency, efficiency, and cost savings, companies with experience applying TCFD recommendations have found that their operations can benefit from enhanced communication, coordination, and engagement. Some companies can gain this from seeking outside expertise, such as from the Nasdaq ESG Advisory team. To streamline the reporting process, companies can benefit from dedicated sustainability software, such as Nasdaq Metrio, to help with TCFD reporting. 

    Corporate ESG Solutions

    Make ESG Your Competitive Advantage

    Know where you stand in the ESG landscape, and how you can prioritize and execute your ESG initiatives while engaging stakeholders. Tell your ESG Story. Make ESG a competitive differentiator.

    Discover solutions -> For more ESG news and resources, visit our ESG Solutions Resource Center ->

    Know where you stand in the ESG landscape, and how you can prioritize and execute your ESG initiatives while engaging stakeholders. Tell your ESG Story. Make ESG a competitive differentiator.

    Discover solutions -> For more ESG news and resources, visit our ESG Solutions Resource Center ->
    Corporate ESG Solutions

    See how you can change your business for the better.

    Contact us for an assessment of how Nasdaq can help you reach your ESG goals

    CORPORATE PLATFORMS

    Drive value and tell your best story with Nasdaq’s full suite of corporate solutions.

    ONEREPORT_ Increase transparency with ESG reporting

    Increase transparency with ESG reporting.

    Simplify the process of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) data capture, engagement, oversight, and disclosure.

    Simplify the process of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) data capture, engagement, oversight, and disclosure.

    IR_Drive valuation and elevate your brand with IR software.

    Drive valuation and elevate your brand with IR software.

    We serve as a trusted advisor, advocate, and provider of software and analytics to issuers globally.

    We serve as a trusted advisor, advocate, and provider of software and analytics to issuers globally.

    Boardvantage_Be prepared with board portal software

    Be prepared with board portal software.

    Streamline meeting management, collaboration, and decision-making processes for boards, committees, and leadership teams.

    Streamline meeting management, collaboration, and decision-making processes for boards, committees, and leadership teams.

    BoardEvaluations_Measure and improve with board evaluations

    Measure and improve with board evaluations.

    Identify opportunities for improvement, promote alignment between the board and management, and turn director feedback into strategic action.

    Identify opportunities for improvement, promote alignment between the board and management, and turn director feedback into strategic action.