Scotiabank views the Federal Communications Commission granting SpaceX a supplemental coverage from space license before AST SpaceMobile (ASTS) as a negative for AST. The development erodes the possibility of AST having a first-mover advantage, “but it doesn’t catch the company off guard,” the analyst tells investors in a research note. Even when the FCC is requiring SpaceX to comply with the out-of-band emissions limits, granting SpaceX the license is likely to cause legal turmoil, contends the firm. It believes that supposing a judge doesn’t stop the ruling, a possible scenario is that T-Mobile (TMUS) will launch some sort of sub-optimal text service while it finds a solution to design issues. The firm says that with the five Bluebirds now in orbit, AT&T (T) and Verizon (VZ) can launch beta testing with real 4G/5G data capabilities “that could lead to SpaceX’s service backfiring.” It expects AST’s support from mobile network operators to remain firm, but says AST bears may question average revenue per user projections given that, initially, SpaceX’s text service could be offered for free to T-Mobile (TMUS) subscribers. Scotiabank has an Outperform rating on AST SpaceMobile with a $44.70 price target
Don't Miss our Black Friday Offers:
- Unlock your investing potential with TipRanks Premium - Now At 40% OFF!
- Make smarter investments with weekly expert stock picks from the Smart Investor Newsletter
Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>>
See today’s best-performing stocks on TipRanks >>
Read More on ASTS:
- AST SpaceMobile CEO Engages in Financial Planning
- AST SpaceMobile (ASTS) Aims to Solve Worldwide Connectivity but Faces Challenges Ahead
- Berkshire reveals stake in Domino’s, Alibaba reports mixed Q2: Morning Buzz
- AST SpaceMobile price target lowered to $44.70 from $45.90 at Scotiabank
- AST SpaceMobile’s Satellite Network Progresses Amid Losses
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
