Credit: The Neuberger Berman SRI Team, along with investors worth $3.6 trillion, is supporting the Joint U.S. and Canadian Announcement on Limiting Methane Emissions from the Oil and Gas Industry in a joint statement that can be found .On March 10, 2016, the US and Canada announced that the two countries would aim to cut methane (CH 4 ) emissions in the oil and gas sector by 40-45% over the next decade.
The Neuberger Berman SRI Team, along with investors worth $3.6 trillion, is supporting the Joint U.S. and Canadian Announcement on Limiting Methane Emissions from the Oil and Gas Industry in a joint statement that can be found .
The Neuberger Berman SRI Team, along with investors worth $3.6 trillion, is supporting the Joint U.S. and Canadian Announcement on Limiting Methane Emissions from the Oil and Gas Industry in a joint statement that can be found here .
Methane, the principal component of natural gas, makes up 10% of the total US GHG emissions compared with CO2 at 82%. Out of this 10%, natural gas and petroleum systems make up 29% of methane emissions, the largest source of CH4 emissions. 1
At the downstream or plant level, natural gas burns with about 50% lower carbon emissions and with lower VOCs making it a cleaner alternative to coal The cleaner emissions characteristics and the higher heat content give natural gas a clear advantage over coal.
At the upstream or production level, natural gas operations release methane emissions, (which are estimated to be significantly more potent than CO 2 emissions). In some cases, studies have shown that methane leaks erode some of that advantage when comparing the life-cycle analysis of gas vs. coal. For instance, a recent Environmental Defense Fund ( EDF ) study found that oil and gas emissions in the Barnett Shale in Texas, were almost twice that of official estimates. 2
The good news is that many of these emissions are avoidable and cost-effective solutions already exist for the industry to reduce methane emissions during the production phase. In fact, a 2014 report by ICF International, a leading technical consulting firm with over thirty years of experience in the energy sector, found that by adopting already available technologies and operating practices, industry could cut methane emissions by 40% over five years for just one penny per thousand cubic feet of produced gas. 3 To illustrate, the following graph highlights existing proven technologies, their climate benefits and net costs.
Proven Technologies
Source: ICF International
As SRI managers, and in keeping with our Statement on Climate change, we support efforts by businesses to reduce their environmental and emissions footprint.
We believe that the joint investor statement to support the U.S. and Canadian governments on limiting methane emissions from the oil and gas industry is consistent with our initiatives focusing on carbon and methane emissions reductions over the past several years including engagement on this topic with our relevant holdings.
- In September 2015, along with industry colleagues, we hosted a discussion on climate change issues including carbon asset risk, carbon pricing and methane regulation. Apache Corp, Noble Energy, two independent oil and gas exploration and production companies, and BHP Billiton, a mining and diversified natural resource company, presented and provided valuable insights. The session was well attended and included internal as well as external investors and research analysts.
- In February 2015, we hosted a panel presentation with leading environmental policy experts to better understand what the upcoming federal methane policy could mean for the U.S. oil and gas industry and its investors. The panel included speakers from the Environmental Defense Fund ( EDF ), ICF International and CDP. NB SRI Portfolio Manager, Ingrid Dyott, moderated the panel. The diverse audience included internal as well as external investors and research analysts.
- White paper on Carbon Footprint Analysis. Assessing carbon impact from a broad perspective can provide valuable investment insights - NB SRI Group 2015
- White paper on Energy, the Environment and the Investment Process - NB SRI Group 2014.
- In 2014, we engaged the EPA to thoughtfully consider cost effective strategies for reducing methane emissions in oil and gas production.
- In 2013, Neuberger Berman joined the CDP Carbon Action request to implement cost-effective emissions reductions.
- Neuberger Berman has been a member of the CDP since 2004.
1 EPA GHG inventory 2013
2 New Study Finds Oil & Gas Methane Emissions in the Barnett Shale Almost Twice What Official Estimates Suggest
http://blogs.edf.org/energyexchange/2015/12/07/new-study-finds-oil-gas-methane-emissions-in-the-barnett-shale-almost-twice-what-official-estimates-suggest/?_ga=1.98642458.506649784.1456246417
3 ICF International http://www.edf.org/energy/icf-methane-cost-curve-report.
This material is provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. Information is obtained from sources deemed reliable, but there is no representation or warranty as to its accuracy, completeness or reliability. All information is current as of the date of this material and is subject to change without notice. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole. Neuberger Berman products and services may not be available in all jurisdictions or to all client types. This material may include estimates, outlooks, projections and other "forward-looking statements." Due to a variety of factors, actual events or market behavior may differ significantly from any views expressed. Investing entails risks, including possible loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Neuberger Berman LLC is a registered investment adviser. The "Neuberger Berman" name and logo are registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Group LLC.
© 2009-2016 Neuberger Berman LLC. | All rights reserved
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
