GE Aerospace (NYSE: GE) stock has recently experienced a dip in value due to J.P. Morgan's decision to lower its estimate for second-quarter sales to $8.4 billion. This estimate is notably lower than the Wall Street analyst consensus of $8.85 billion, but is it a reason to sell the stock? Here's what you need to know before taking action.
The reason for the downgrade
J.P. Morgan's analyst is arguing that there's a mounting risk GE Aerospace could miss its delivery target for engines in 2024 amid ongoing supply chain pressures in the industry. Fewer engine deliveries mean less revenue, and the analyst believes the company could have a shortfall in the second quarter and possibly beyond.
If there is an engine delivery shortfall, it would be a negative, but there are several reasons investors shouldn't panic.
Near-term profitability
First, a slowdown in engine deliveries is a net positive for profit margins. Airplane engines are usually sold at breakeven or at a loss. The actual earnings and cash flow come from the multiple decades of aftermarket and service revenue generated on long-term contracts.
Indeed, the J.P. Morgan analyst maintained GE Aerospace's earnings and cash flow expectations for 2024. The analyst also kept the stock's $175 price target and overweight rating for reference.
This point is exemplified by the fact that GE Aerospace has already reduced its projections for engine deliveries this year. However, that cut led to an increase in margin and profit expectations, as outlined below. During theearnings callin April, chief financial officer Rahul Ghai put the profit-guidance hike down to "favorable revenue dynamics." As you can see below, GE Aerospace cut 2024 delivery expectations for the Leading Edge Aviation Propulsion (LEAP) engine used on the Boeing 737 MAX and the Airbus A320neo family of airplanes.
|
GE Aerospace Commercial Engines & Services (CES) Guidance |
In January |
In April |
|---|---|---|
|
Revenue growth |
Mid to high teens |
Mid to high teens |
|
LEAP engine delivery growth |
20%-25% |
10%-15% |
|
CES profit margin |
Flat |
Up 50 basis points |
|
CES profit |
$6 billion to $6.3 billion |
$6.1 billion to $6.4 billion |
Data source: GE Aerospace presentations.
Positive earnings drivers
Second, while a delay in LEAP engine deliveries is not what management wants, it could result in positives elsewhere. For example, new engines take years to start generating aftermarket revenue, so a delay in new engine deliveries could mean older engines, such as the CFM56 (used on the legacy Boeing 737 and Airbus A320 families), are used more -- meaning more aftermarket revenue from them.
CFM International, a 50/50 joint venture between GE Aerospace and Safran, manufactures the CFM56 and LEAP engines. On GE's investor day in March, management forecast that CFM56 shop visits (when engines are brought in for maintenance, repair, and overhaul) would peak in 2025.
Image source: Getty Images.
Fast-forward to April (when management cut its LEAP engine delivery forecast), and Vertical Research's Rob Stallard asked CEO Larry Culp whether the LEAP engine delays had "positive implications for the CFM56 shop-visit peak." Culp answered yes but declined to guess the quarter to which it would be pushed out. "But it's a positive dynamic for us in the aftermarket, both with existing platforms and increasingly with the LEAP," Culp said.
In other words, the delay in LEAP engine deliveries could generate more lucrative aftermarket revenue for CFM56 and LEAP engines already in service.
An issue over the long term?
While acknowledging that there could be some near-term positives from LEAP engine delivery delays, it's important to note that GE Aerospace doesn't want that to occur. Engine delivery delays push out the cash flows from aftermarket revenue.
Image source: Getty Images.
Still, some context is necessary here. Airplane engines can be used for more than 40 years, so the aftermarket earnings and cash flow will be stretched over many years. As such, a delay of 200 engines over six months (CFM delivered 1,570 LEAP engines in 2023) is unlikely to affect long-term earnings and cash-flow-based valuations greatly.
All told, while potential delays are not great news, they're not as big a deal over the near and long term.
Should you invest $1,000 in GE Aerospace right now?
Before you buy stock in GE Aerospace, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and GE Aerospace wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $802,591!*
Stock Advisor provides investors with an easy-to-follow blueprint for success, including guidance on building a portfolio, regular updates from analysts, and two new stock picks each month. The Stock Advisor service has more than quadrupled the return of S&P 500 since 2002*.
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 10, 2024
JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of The Ascent, a Motley Fool company. Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends JPMorgan Chase. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
