Key Points
SLV and GDX both charge similar fees and target the basic materials sector.
SLV delivered a slightly higher one-year return and shallower five-year drawdown compared to GDX.
GDX holds 57 companies and is concentrated in its top positions.
- 10 stocks we like better than VanEck ETF Trust - VanEck Gold Miners ETF ›
The VanEck Gold Miners ETF (NYSEMKT:GDX) and the iShares Silver Trust (NYSEMKT:SLV) both offer basic materials exposure with nearly identical expense ratios. Still, SLV tracks physical silver prices while GDX invests in a basket of gold mining stocks.
GDX and SLV appeal to investors interested in precious metals, yet they represent two distinct approaches: GDX takes an equity route by holding shares of major gold miners. At the same time, SLV provides direct exposure to silver’s spot price. This comparison breaks down key differences in cost, performance, risk, and portfolio construction to help clarify which ETF may appeal depending on investment goals.
Snapshot (cost & size)
| Metric | SLV | GDX |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | iShares | VanEck |
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.51% |
| 1-yr return (as of 2026-03-31) | 119.9% | 101.0% |
| Beta | 2.00 | 0.66 |
| AUM | $36.7 billion | $29.5 billion |
Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.
Both ETFs are similarly priced, with SLV at a 0.50% annual expense ratio and GDX at 0.51%, so cost differences are negligible.
Performance & risk comparison
| Metric | SLV | GDX |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown (5 y) | (42.5%) | (49.8%) |
| Growth of $1,000 over 5 years | $2,199 | $2,010 |
Both funds have seen large swings, but SLV experienced a smaller maximum drawdown over five years and slightly better long-term growth, reflecting the different risk profiles of physical silver versus gold mining equities.
What's inside
GDX offers exposure to 57 global gold mining companies, all of which are in the basic materials sector. The largest holdings are currently Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd (NYSE:AEM), Newmont (NYSE:NEM), and Barrick Mining Corp (NYSE:B). These positions account for a significant share of assets. The fund’s nearly 20-year track record may appeal to those seeking diversified equity exposure tied to gold prices. Still, returns will be influenced by both gold’s value and the operating performance of mining firms.
SLV, by contrast, is a pure-play on physical silver, reflecting the metal’s price movements without any company-specific or operational risk. Its entire exposure is to basic materials, but it does not hold equity positions—just the underlying commodity. This makes SLV structurally simpler and more direct for those seeking silver price participation.
For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.
What this means for investors
Both of these precious metals ETFs share similar expense ratios and asset sizes. These funds have also delivered roughly similar returns over the past five years, with SLV slightly outperforming GDX through the end of March.
The key distinction between these funds is that GDX focuses on mining companies, while SLV is a bet on the directional movement of the physical price of silver. The advantage for GDX is that some of the mining stocks pay dividends, although it’s not much at 0.67%.
But keep in mind that GDX has underperformed gold since its inception. This highlights the added risk of investing in a mining fund. With GDX, investors are essentially making two bets — one on the direction of gold prices and the other on the performance of the mining companies in the fund.
However, there could be periods when GDX outperforms gold, such as when company margins expand during a bull market.
SLV doesn’t pay dividends, but it doesn’t have the added company risk of GDX. It’s a simpler bet on the directional price of silver, with no operational risks or leverage.
Should you buy stock in VanEck ETF Trust - VanEck Gold Miners ETF right now?
Before you buy stock in VanEck ETF Trust - VanEck Gold Miners ETF, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and VanEck ETF Trust - VanEck Gold Miners ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $515,294!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,077,442!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 917% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
*Stock Advisor returns as of April 2, 2026.
John Ballard has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
