PagerDuty (PD) reported $118.95 million in revenue for the quarter ended October 2024, representing a year-over-year increase of 9.4%. EPS of $0.25 for the same period compares to $0.20 a year ago.
The reported revenue compares to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $116.5 million, representing a surprise of +2.10%. The company delivered an EPS surprise of +56.25%, with the consensus EPS estimate being $0.16.
While investors scrutinize revenue and earnings changes year-over-year and how they compare with Wall Street expectations to determine their next move, some key metrics always offer a more accurate picture of a company's financial health.
Since these metrics play a crucial role in driving the top- and bottom-line numbers, comparing them with the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated about them helps investors better project a stock's price performance.
Here is how PagerDuty performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts:
- Total Billings: $117.77 million compared to the $119.39 million average estimate based on three analysts.
- Customers: 15,050 versus the two-analyst average estimate of 15,046.
- Dollar-based Net Retention Rate: 107% compared to the 106.3% average estimate based on two analysts.
Shares of PagerDuty have returned +13.8% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +3.8% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), indicating that it could outperform the broader market in the near term.
7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days
Just released: Experts distill 7 elite stocks from the current list of 220 Zacks Rank #1 Strong Buys. They deem these tickers "Most Likely for Early Price Pops."
Since 1988, the full list has beaten the market more than 2X over with an average gain of +24.1% per year. So be sure to give these hand picked 7 your immediate attention.
See them now >>PagerDuty (PD) : Free Stock Analysis Report
To read this article on Zacks.com click here.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
