Credit: Shutterstock photoApple ( AAPL ) may be able to achieve double-digit earnings and revenue growth. But the iPhone maker is effectively in a league of its own -The magnitude of Apple's results has a bearing on the aggregate earnings picture, particularly for the Technology sector. But it's earnings performance and outlook doesn't tell us much about what to expect from other operators, even in the Technology sector.
Beyond Apple's strong quarterly report, the picture emerging from the Q1 earning season is one of widespread weakness, particularly on the revenues side. Growth is anemic, most companies are coming short of revenue estimates and guidance continues to be on the weak side, causing estimates for the current period to come down.
The strong U.S. dollar has widely been blamed for the Q1 weakness. The 'dollar scapegoating' makes sense, particularly when we compare the results of large-cap companies with small-cap operators. The large-cap companies in the S&P 500 index have substantial exposure to currency issues. After all, they earn an estimated 40% of their revenues from beyond the U.S. shores. Smaller companies aren't entirely focused on the domestic market either, but they have a lot less international exposure.
You can see this divergence in the contrasting Q1 revenue performance of the S&P 500 and Russell 2000 companies. While the ratio of S&P 500 members coming short of consensus revenue estimates is significantly above levels that we have seen in other recent reporting cycles, there is no such issue with the Russell 2000 members. We should keep in mind however that while we are quite further along in the reporting cycle for the large-cap index (47.6% of S&P 500 members have already reported results, as of April 28th), we are still at a relatively early stage for the small-caps (21.7% of Russell 2000 members have reported results).
The S&P 500 Scorecard
As of this morning's reports from Pfizer ( PFE ), UPS ( UPS ) and many others, we have now Q1 results from 238 S&P 500 members that combined account for 60.7% of the index's total market capitalization. Total earnings for these 238 companies are up +9.9% from the period last year, with 68.2% beating earnings estimates. Total revenues for these companies are essentially flat (up only +0.1%), with 41.8% beating top-line estimates.
Here is the current scorecard for the 238 S&P 500 companies that have reported results already
This is weak performance compared to what we have seen from the same group of companies in other recent quarters, as the side-by-side charts below shows.
The left-hand side chart compares the earnings and revenue growth rates for these 238 S&P 500 members with what these same companies reported in the preceding quarter and the average growth rates for these companies in the preceding four quarters (the 4-quarter average is through 2014 Q4). The right-hand side chart does the same comparison for these 238 S&P 500 members, but compares only the earnings and revenue beat ratios.
Here are the takeaways from looking at these comparison charts
- The earnings growth rate (+9.9%) is notably better compared to other recent quarters. But the favorable comparison disappears once Finance is excluded from the aggregate data.
- The revenue growth rate (+0.1%) is notably below what we saw from this group of companies in Q4 (+3.2%) as well as in the 4-quarter average (+4%).
- The earnings beat ratio is about in-line with the recent past.
- The revenue beat ratio is notably below what these same companies reported in the preceding as well as 4-quarter average.
The Russell 2000 Scorecard
Including this morning's reports, we now have Q1 results from 432 Russell 2000 members that combined account for 24.5% of the small-cap index's total market capitalization. Total earnings for these Russell members are up +24.6% from the same period last year on +7.2% higher revenues, with 53.9% beating earnings estimates and 40.3% beating revenue estimates.
Here is the current scorecard for the 432 Russell 2000 companies that have reported results already
This is a modestly better performance than we have seen from the same group of 432 Russell 2000 members in other recent periods, as the charts below show.
The most notable takeaway from the Russell 2000 comparison chart above is the revenue beat ratio. The chart below focuses solely on the beat ratio by doing a side-by-side comparison of beat ratios for the two indexes.
The Bottom line
The relatively reporting season for the Russell 2000 members does not mean that the overall earnings picture isn't weak - it is fairly weak. While a number of the Russell members will eventually generate a lot of earnings and make it to the large-cap index at some stage in the future, but the magnitude of their current earnings pale in comparison to what the large-caps make. All of the Russell 2000 members combined will earn roughly equal to what Apple earned on its own in Q1. That said, the small-caps do have an advantage in limited exposure to the strong U.S. dollar.
Our weekly Earnings Trends report, coming out on Wednesday will give a detailed update on the Q1 earnings season. But if you want to see our last Earnings Trends report, you can find it here .
Note : Want more articles from this author? Scroll up to the top of this article and click the FOLLOW AUTHOR button to get an email each time a new article is published.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
UTD PARCEL SRVC (UPS): Free Stock Analysis Report
PFIZER INC (PFE): Free Stock Analysis Report
APPLE INC (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report
To read this article on Zacks.com click here.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
