Credit: Shutterstock photo
Visa ( ) has seen its expenses grow by close to 33% over the last five years. The biggest contributor to this increase has been the increase client incentives and rebates, which have increased by almost 50% over the period, resulting in their contribution to overall costs increasing from 24.3% in 2011 to 27.7% in 2015. General and Administrative expenses have grown from $ 2.6 billion in 2011 to $3.45 billion in 2015, but their contribution to overall costs has remained at around 33%.
Visa ( V ) has seen its expenses grow by close to 33% over the last five years. The biggest contributor to this increase has been the increase client incentives and rebates, which have increased by almost 50% over the period, resulting in their contribution to overall costs increasing from 24.3% in 2011 to 27.7% in 2015. General and Administrative expenses have grown from $ 2.6 billion in 2011 to $3.45 billion in 2015, but their contribution to overall costs has remained at around 33%.
Have more questions about Visa? See the links below:
- How Much Did Visa's Revenue & Gross Profit Grow In The Last Five Years?
- How Much Can Visa's Revenue Grow In The Next Five Years?
- What Is Visa's Fundamental Value Based On Expected 2016 Results?
- How Has Visa's Revenue Composition Changed In The Last Five Years?
Notes:
1) The purpose of these analyses is to help readers focus on a few important things. We hope such lean communication sparks thinking, and encourages readers to comment and ask questions on the comment section, or email content@trefis.com
2) Figures mentioned are approximate values to help our readers remember the key concepts more intuitively. For precise figures, please refer to our complete analysis for Visa
Interactive Institutional Research (Powered by Trefis):
Global Large Cap | U.S. Mid & Small Cap | European Large & Mid Cap | More Trefis Research
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
