Credit: The Hulk still can't smash Universal's chains. Source: Marvel.The battle between Disney 's Marvel and Fox over the future of the X-Men and the Fantastic Four just turned ugly.
The Hulk still can't smash Universal's chains. Source: Marvel.
That means Sony , which owns the film rights to Spider-Man , and Fox, which controls the X-Men and Fantastic Four , are next on Disney's hit list. According to recent rumors at HitFix, Sony might let Spider-Man join Disney's Marvel Cinematic Universe, or MCU, while retaining distribution rights for solo films. Fox, on the other hand, has no plans to play ball with Disney -- it will reboot the Fantastic Four next year, followed by a solo Deadpool film and X-Men: Age of Apocalypse in 2016.
Disney doesn't want Fox to develop its own MCU because it wants to profit from those properties, and it doesn't want moviegoers to be confused by two rival MCUs that are expanding at the same time. Therefore, Marvel believes axing the Fantastic Four comic book and eliminating new characters in the X-Men could disrupt Fox's long-term plans and possibly force Fox back to the negotiating table.
Why Marvel's strategy makes no sense
Yet that strategy makes no sense from a financial perspective. Marvel reported $125 million in publishing revenue in 2008, its last full fiscal year before the Disney takeover.
Comichron reported that North American comic book revenue rose 20% between 2008 and 2013, so we can assume Marvel's print comics still generate around $150 million per year -- a drop in the pond compared to Disney's $45 billion in revenue last year. Meanwhile, revenue growth is outpacing comic books sold, which climbed less than 4% between 2008 and 2013. This indicates that increased revenue mostly came from higher cover prices for comics being sold to a stagnant reader base.
By comparison, Disney grossed over $4.7 billion with its past five MCU films in the past two years, while Fox's The Wolverine (2013) and X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014) grossed nearly $1.2 billion. Most of the revenue from all of these films came from foreign markets, where Marvel's print comics have limited distribution. That indicates many foreign audiences simply flock to see action-packed summer blockbusters, with little regard to the source material.
In comparing comic book sales with film releases, we can see that films help comic book sales, and not the other way around. For example, when Fox released the first Fantastic Four film in July 2005, Ultimate Fantastic Four became the ninth-best-selling comic book that month, up from 21st place a month earlier, according to Comichron.
It is shortsighted and naive to believe that canceling the Fantastic Four comic book, which only sold 28,000 issues in September, will disrupt Fox's upcoming film reboot. It's also absurd to believe that Marvel's creative teams could suddenly create a brand new X-Men character popular enough to be integrated into Fox's film franchises.
The Foolish takeaway
Marvel would clearly like to make films with all of its characters, but it already has plenty on its plate with its MCU planned until 2017. Disrupting its print comics out of spite is just bad for PR, and dramatically reduces the likelihood of a cross-studio crossover between the X-Men , the Fantastic Four , and the Avengers in the future.
Apple Watch revealed: The real winner is inside
Apple recently revealed the product of its secret-development "dream team" -- Apple Watch. The secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see where the real money is to be made, just click here !
The article How Disney's Marvel Is Crippling Fox's X-Men Movies With Comics originally appeared on Fool.com.
Leo Sun owns shares of Walt Disney. The Motley Fool recommends Walt Disney. The Motley Fool owns shares of Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days . We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .
Copyright © 1995 - 2014 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
